Are Farmers AgTech Guinea Pigs?

What Ag History Teaches Us About AgTech Today

Over the Holiday’s I read a Linkedin post from a farmer in Australia: The AgTech Revolution is a Glitch.

The farmer highlighted multiple frustrations with agtech, equipment manufacturers and equipment dealers.

I empathize with farmer frustration in using some new products and services — particularly when there are legitimately some poorly operated and executed products and services. The incremental stress and hassle added to an already time constrained and pressure packed part of the year is understandably infuriating.

However, I do think it is important to put a few things into context.

Ill highlight two sections from the post that I think are important to level-set.

The first:

The AgTech Revolution is a Glitch

The industry wants to talk about AI-driven neural networks and digital ecosystems. Back in reality, we are still just using guidance and section control. If it doesn’t work at 2 AM in a dust storm, it isn’t disruptive, it’s an expensive paperweight. Most of the future we are sold is just noise.

I think all of us would agree, products should work when they are taken to the farm.

The reality is that implementing perfect technology from the get-go is very hard.

Farming doesn’t occur in a closed loop, low stakes consumer environment, often affording numerous iterations to get product bugs out.

In diverse, dusty, and unconnected environments, like in farming, it is even more challenging.

However, one thing I would call out is that even what he cites as “standard” (guidance and sectional control) is still “ag technology.”

AgTech has been an incredible driver of everything a farmer uses today, not to mention the division of labour more broadly.

Had Linkedin been around in 1996, I am certain there would have been some similar complaints towards auto steer, or new seeding technology systems.

Every technology ever implemented on a farm has likely had some sort of short-term pain — whether a learning curve, short coming in usability or purely the inertia that is created by doing something the same way for 30 years and then having to change.

Change is hard.

Over Christmas I read the book Innovation and It’s Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies by Calestous Juma (good book, effectively an ag and food innovation book as 6 of the 9 technology case studies are related to agriculture and food — from coffee, to GMOs, to cold storage technology, margarine, and more are all covered).

One dominant emphasis was Farm Mechanization and farmer apprehension, providing another lens on top of what was shared in another great book, Tractor Wars.

In the Farm Mechanization section, two quotes stood out to me surrounding tractor adoption and the applicability to technology on farm today.

The first:

“It is notable that the rapid growth in the use of the gas tractor did not occur because it was superior to the horse. There were simply large tracts of unbroken prairie land that were being opened up in the West without a sufficient number of horses to do the work. Businesses, however, did not consider the tractor to be a good investment. The tractor did not operate as smoothly as the horse; maintenance often cost more than the purchase price; and its size and weight made it impractical for the small farm. Some felt that the manufacturing companies had brought the tractor to the market prematurely.”

Note the last sentence. Farmers thought the technology was brought to the farm pre-maturely.

Subscribe to Upstream Ag Professional to read the rest.

Become a paying member of Upstream Ag to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Already a paying subscriber? Sign In.

A Professional Membership Delivers:

  • • Subscriber-only insights and deep analysis plus full archive access
  • • Audio edition for consumption flexibility
  • • AskUpstream Access, the LLM for serious agribusiness professionals
  • • Access to the Report Hub and Visualization Hub